Review





Similar Products

94
MedChemExpress hy 112754a cfse medchemexpress
Hy 112754a Cfse Medchemexpress, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hy 112754a cfse medchemexpress/product/MedChemExpress
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hy 112754a cfse medchemexpress - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cytek Biosciences cfse fluorescence
(A) Schematic overview of the experimental design for CHARM editing, tracking and sorting of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells, and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation. (B) Top, representative <t>CFSE</t> dilution profiles of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells at days 2 and 7 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Bottom, targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in the sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (C) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (D) Schematic overview of the experimental design for extended cytokine-free culture and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (E) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs at day 11 and day 29 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (F) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from HSPCs after extended cytokine-free culture following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (G) Schematic overview of the experimental design for serial CFU replating and targeted bisulfite sequencing following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (H) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs after CHARM editing and in cells derived from primary (1°), secondary (2°), and tertiary (3°) CFU replatings following targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. All data are presented as mean ± SD, significance is indicated as * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, or n.s. not significant.
Cfse Fluorescence, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cfse fluorescence/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cfse fluorescence - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress cfse
(A) Schematic overview of the experimental design for CHARM editing, tracking and sorting of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells, and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation. (B) Top, representative <t>CFSE</t> dilution profiles of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells at days 2 and 7 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Bottom, targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in the sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (C) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (D) Schematic overview of the experimental design for extended cytokine-free culture and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (E) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs at day 11 and day 29 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (F) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from HSPCs after extended cytokine-free culture following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (G) Schematic overview of the experimental design for serial CFU replating and targeted bisulfite sequencing following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (H) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs after CHARM editing and in cells derived from primary (1°), secondary (2°), and tertiary (3°) CFU replatings following targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. All data are presented as mean ± SD, significance is indicated as * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, or n.s. not significant.
Cfse, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cfse/product/MedChemExpress
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cfse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MedChemExpress cfda se
(A) Schematic overview of the experimental design for CHARM editing, tracking and sorting of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells, and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation. (B) Top, representative <t>CFSE</t> dilution profiles of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells at days 2 and 7 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Bottom, targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in the sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (C) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (D) Schematic overview of the experimental design for extended cytokine-free culture and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (E) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs at day 11 and day 29 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (F) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from HSPCs after extended cytokine-free culture following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (G) Schematic overview of the experimental design for serial CFU replating and targeted bisulfite sequencing following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (H) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs after CHARM editing and in cells derived from primary (1°), secondary (2°), and tertiary (3°) CFU replatings following targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. All data are presented as mean ± SD, significance is indicated as * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, or n.s. not significant.
Cfda Se, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cfda se/product/MedChemExpress
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cfda se - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MedChemExpress carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester
In vitro killing assay using dendritic cells pulsed with E6 or mock peptide and labeled with high (5 µM) or low (0.5 <t>µM)</t> <t>CFDA-SE</t> (N = 5/group). CD28ko CTLs showed significantly lower killing compared to B6 CTLs after expansion (p < 0.05), particularly at E:T ratios of 50:1 and 20:1 (A, p < 0.05). Transcriptional analysis showed markedly lower CD28 and TNFα but not IL-6 expression in CD28ko CTLs versus B6 CTLs, indicating impaired functionality that may contribute to delayed viral clearance (C, p < 0.05).
Carboxyfluorescein Succinimidyl Ester, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester/product/MedChemExpress
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
MedChemExpress carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester
In vitro killing assay using dendritic cells pulsed with E6 or mock peptide and labeled with high (5 µM) or low (0.5 <t>µM)</t> <t>CFDA-SE</t> (N = 5/group). CD28ko CTLs showed significantly lower killing compared to B6 CTLs after expansion (p < 0.05), particularly at E:T ratios of 50:1 and 20:1 (A, p < 0.05). Transcriptional analysis showed markedly lower CD28 and TNFα but not IL-6 expression in CD28ko CTLs versus B6 CTLs, indicating impaired functionality that may contribute to delayed viral clearance (C, p < 0.05).
Carboxyfluorescein Diacetate Succinimidyl Ester, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester/product/MedChemExpress
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cytek Biosciences carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester
In vitro killing assay using dendritic cells pulsed with E6 or mock peptide and labeled with high (5 µM) or low (0.5 <t>µM)</t> <t>CFDA-SE</t> (N = 5/group). CD28ko CTLs showed significantly lower killing compared to B6 CTLs after expansion (p < 0.05), particularly at E:T ratios of 50:1 and 20:1 (A, p < 0.05). Transcriptional analysis showed markedly lower CD28 and TNFα but not IL-6 expression in CD28ko CTLs versus B6 CTLs, indicating impaired functionality that may contribute to delayed viral clearance (C, p < 0.05).
Carboxyfluorescein Diacetate Succinimidyl Ester, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester/product/Cytek Biosciences
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
MedChemExpress carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester cfse
In vitro killing assay using dendritic cells pulsed with E6 or mock peptide and labeled with high (5 µM) or low (0.5 <t>µM)</t> <t>CFDA-SE</t> (N = 5/group). CD28ko CTLs showed significantly lower killing compared to B6 CTLs after expansion (p < 0.05), particularly at E:T ratios of 50:1 and 20:1 (A, p < 0.05). Transcriptional analysis showed markedly lower CD28 and TNFα but not IL-6 expression in CD28ko CTLs versus B6 CTLs, indicating impaired functionality that may contribute to delayed viral clearance (C, p < 0.05).
Carboxyfluorescein Succinimidyl Ester Cfse, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester cfse/product/MedChemExpress
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester cfse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(A) Schematic overview of the experimental design for CHARM editing, tracking and sorting of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells, and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation. (B) Top, representative CFSE dilution profiles of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells at days 2 and 7 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Bottom, targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in the sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (C) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (D) Schematic overview of the experimental design for extended cytokine-free culture and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (E) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs at day 11 and day 29 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (F) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from HSPCs after extended cytokine-free culture following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (G) Schematic overview of the experimental design for serial CFU replating and targeted bisulfite sequencing following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (H) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs after CHARM editing and in cells derived from primary (1°), secondary (2°), and tertiary (3°) CFU replatings following targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. All data are presented as mean ± SD, significance is indicated as * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, or n.s. not significant.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Epigenome editing of human hematopoietic stem cells enables sustained and reversible thrombosis prevention

doi: 10.64898/2026.03.27.714536

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic overview of the experimental design for CHARM editing, tracking and sorting of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells, and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation. (B) Top, representative CFSE dilution profiles of CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells at days 2 and 7 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Bottom, targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in the sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (C) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from sorted CD34 + CD45RA − CD90 + cells following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (D) Schematic overview of the experimental design for extended cytokine-free culture and subsequent megakaryocytic differentiation following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (E) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs at day 11 and day 29 following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. (F) Left, representative flow cytometry histograms of CD61 ( ITGB3 ) surface expression in megakaryocytes differentiated from HSPCs after extended cytokine-free culture following CHARM targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Right, quantification of the percentage of CD61 + cells among differentiated megakaryocytes. (G) Schematic overview of the experimental design for serial CFU replating and targeted bisulfite sequencing following CHARM editing of HSPCs. (H) Targeted bisulfite sequencing displaying CpG methylation patterns near the ITGB3 TSS in HSPCs after CHARM editing and in cells derived from primary (1°), secondary (2°), and tertiary (3°) CFU replatings following targeting of the ITGB3 promoter or AAVS1 as a control. Each circle represents an individual CpG site; filled circles indicate methylated CpGs. All data are presented as mean ± SD, significance is indicated as * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, or n.s. not significant.

Article Snippet: CFSE fluorescence was assessed by flow cytometric analysis on a Cytek Aurora flow cytometer at day 0 and day 5 after labeling.

Techniques: Control, Methylation Sequencing, CpG Methylation Assay, Methylation, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Derivative Assay

In vitro killing assay using dendritic cells pulsed with E6 or mock peptide and labeled with high (5 µM) or low (0.5 µM) CFDA-SE (N = 5/group). CD28ko CTLs showed significantly lower killing compared to B6 CTLs after expansion (p < 0.05), particularly at E:T ratios of 50:1 and 20:1 (A, p < 0.05). Transcriptional analysis showed markedly lower CD28 and TNFα but not IL-6 expression in CD28ko CTLs versus B6 CTLs, indicating impaired functionality that may contribute to delayed viral clearance (C, p < 0.05).

Journal: PLOS Pathogens

Article Title: CD28-deficient mice are vulnerable to mouse papillomavirus MmuPV1 infection of the skin and mucosae

doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013968

Figure Lengend Snippet: In vitro killing assay using dendritic cells pulsed with E6 or mock peptide and labeled with high (5 µM) or low (0.5 µM) CFDA-SE (N = 5/group). CD28ko CTLs showed significantly lower killing compared to B6 CTLs after expansion (p < 0.05), particularly at E:T ratios of 50:1 and 20:1 (A, p < 0.05). Transcriptional analysis showed markedly lower CD28 and TNFα but not IL-6 expression in CD28ko CTLs versus B6 CTLs, indicating impaired functionality that may contribute to delayed viral clearance (C, p < 0.05).

Article Snippet: 1 × 10 4 target cells cultured with 1ug/ml of E6/90–99 or a control peptide were incubated in either 5uM or 0.5uM carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE, HY-D0938, MedChemExpress, NJ, USA) for 30 minutes, washed twice with medium and added to different dilutions of effector CTLs (E/T ratios of 50:1, 20:1 and 10:1) for up to six hours.

Techniques: In Vitro, Labeling, Expressing